A matter of justice, not charity
There
are four kinds of poor people: those who don’t have anything to eat or
the basic health services, those who don’t have access to the most
elemental education, those who don’t know they are poor and finally,
those who don’t even know they are human beings. There are millions of
beings who have accepted their inhumane situation with a horrible
fatalism. They obey, drag themselves and suffer because they don’t
have the strength to either rebel themselves or to demand what naturally
belongs to them. United
Nations numbers repeat themselves and show that there are more than one
billion poor people in the world, that 1.5 billion don’t have access
to clean water; that the situation has gone beyond the social sphere and
has become inhumane; and that there will be space for any form of
explosion. Those whose dignity and whose basic rights to benefit from
the goods and the services created by society are not recognized can’t
be subjected to man’s law. Private property can never be absolute
because it is always mortgaged by the right to life and the basic well
being of all human beings. Basic rights are not the product of effort,
inheritance or fortune; they are inherent to human condition. When
those basic rights have been infringed, poverty and marginalization
become exclusion, the “social bomb” denounced by Butros Galli in
Copenhagen’s Summit. Many
people, the so-called “homeless” live on the streets of many large
cities. These situations are the result of mental illness, attention
problems of the community, broken families, addiction to drugs or to
alcohol, difficulties to become adapted after serving sentences in
prison or immigrants who face a society that doesn’t take care of them
while it keeps high levels of unemployment and of labor precariousness.
Uprooted people take part of the wider “social exclusion” context,
which cannot be simply reduced to the lack of home. Many
of these men and women have been rejected by official institutions or
depend on them because they have been their guests at mental
institutions, at the orphanage, in prison, in social diners. In many
cases, the absence of a home or a bed, the rigor of the cold or the
asphyxia of the summer heats are the least relevant matters. The saddest
of all lacks is not to be aware of one’s own dignity as a person, of
one’s rights and duties. The most aberrant thing is to fall on
apathy’s hands and on the cynical attitude as a result of not having
someone else to love us. The cause of all this is that natural rights
are not being recognized. We
have called them beggars, poverty-stricken, etc. These are derogatory
terms that do not respond to the more diverse reality we want to
describe. Nowadays we use the term “homeless” because it implies a
common lack of family, roots, friendship, love and any other factor that
would suggest human closeness. But there are other forms of exclusion,
like the ones elderly people, chronically ill or disabled people suffer
each day. The
problem is less acute in rural societies because it is framed in the
ancestral concept of the great family and of solidarity. In the largest
cities of the developed world where all those evils come out with all
their harshness, lacerating the most elemental justice. Immigration
without assistance, family dismemberment, consumerism and overwhelming
squandering, the loss of values and criteria other than maximum benefit,
the triumph over others and of the “anything goes” attitude as long
as we possess in detriment of the natural rights of being. Patches
of good intentions and charity are not enough to silence those who have
the right to demand their realization in terms of justice, no matter how
respectable they are. The
Declarations of Human Rights and political rights are not enough if they
do not become social rights for all. That is the great pending
assignment of the European Union, where almost three million people who
are recognized as “excluded”, and in the rest of the industrialized
countries of the sociological North. Things don’t belong to their
owners, they belong to those who need them. And it is legitimate to take
by strength what is not obtained through justice given that the due to
resistance in front of tyrannical situations converts into a legitimate
right when the weakest people suffer. Nobody has been born to suffer and
fantasies of hypothetical futures are not welcome. Paradise is nothing
other than the projection of the myth of the Golden Age over the future. |
*
Professor of Political Thought (UCM) and CCS Director
Translated by Carlos Miguélez